And at that point it would take FOREVER to re-encode however many movies that I would have at that point. What I decide now could affect me in the future. I could have stored ~twice the amount of movies 720p vs 1080p. If I do many movies, there could, concievably, come a point at which I am out of space. While I'm not at a loss for space right now (9TB available on my NAS), I'm saving both the ORIGINAL rip (30 to 50 GB) plus the encoded version for easy watching and portability. So could you give me one single sane reason why you simply don't make good quality 1080p versions? You are ripping and saving your BDs to disk. Would you rather have a lower quality 1080p, or higher quality 720p file? Honestly I do not understand how you get into this false dilemma. The third number is the GB size of a 1080p encode at quality setting 19 (For comparison only) The second number is the GB size of a 1080p encode at quality setting 20 (Lower quality than 720p, larger size) The first number is the GB size of a 720p encode at quality setting 19 (Smaller size then 1080p, higher quality) Thanks.īelow are my results encoding several movies. Would you rather have a lower quality 1080p, or higher quality 720p file?įor comparison sake, I did some test runs, and here are the size differences I came up with? Thoughts? Should I be using other settings instead? It would seem that for the most part, the increase in file size to the 1080p is still within reasonable size limits. I'm still messing around with the quality settings in Handbrake, and it brought up an interesting question. I don't have a huge BD collection, but I've decided to start ripping and saving my collection.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |